Don't forget your first dream! — ravenfal: theabcsofjustice: Awww, I like the...

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
ravenfal
theabcsofjustice

Awww, I like the shots showing Atem with his Aibou and Judai with his own. Also it’s definitely nice to see that Judai’s passion for dueling has been fully reawakened again. He had definitely lost it and although he was relearning how to have fun with duels before now, his enthusiasm still wasn’t quite as active as it used to be. So it’s nice to see that he’s determined to never forget about it again and to hold on to that feeling because it’s an important one to have. ;__;

Lol, also poor Neos is probably like “DAMN IT JUDAI WHY?” ^^;;

ravenfal

Unpopular opinion: I think Judai would have won if he hadn’t attacked Slifer. Why? Nearly all of Yugi’s best combos were already used up (Mirror Force, Magic Cylinder, Dark Revival, and now this), while Judai still has Super Polymerization, Yubel (and Yubel’s higher forms), and a far superior field. Yugi’s hand is also currently filled with monsters he can’t summon, and his field’s empty. At the end of this turn, Slifer would return to the graveyard, and Judai would have an overwhelming advantage. Given that he can pull off the same kind of miracle draws Yugi can, and no card of Yugi’s could guarantee a win in the next turn, Judai probably would have won.

That being said, that clearly wasn’t the point and I’m happy our MC finally found that smile of his again.

yu gi oh yu gi oh gx but also... agreed with all of this (especially the very last line) for me it was just the devs wanting a cool shot to end the duel x)) I don't know why I always felt like that duel never ended probably because its outcome isn't important at all

See more posts like this on Tumblr

#yu gi oh #yu gi oh gx #but also...

More you might like

neil-gaiman
yesokayiknow

image
12ft |
12ft.io

'why are actors striking aren't they all millionaires' here's a paywall free link to an article that mentions how most of the cast of one of netflix's biggest shows had day jobs bc they couldn't afford rent

heresiae

remember that actors are usually not well off at all. forget the big screen famous guys, they're the very few ones. this strike is for all the other ones, that deserve to have a livable paycheck for their job.

neil-gaiman

And a note to say that, had Orange is the New Black been on a not-streaming network which paid them residuals each time they screened the show the actors would have done fine or better than fine.

At the start of streaming rules were agreed to let these beginning ways of putting out stories over the web succeed and get established, and letting them not pay actors and writers traditional style residuals was part of what was agreed. They got established. They succeeded. The actors and the writers took the hit.

thepowderedtoastman

Streaming actors get screwed ten ways to Sunday. I'm still a part of the Union of BC Performers because I did work when I was young, and for a movie I was in when I was FIVE YEARS OLD, for around 30 SECONDS, in a movie that did poorly, I make more money in residuals than any of the leading actors in OITNB do for all of their hard work as adult professionals. It's sick, quite frankly, and I for one can't wait for the WGA and SAG to land lucrative contracts. There's no way in hell I should get more on my quarterly checks than the talent who worked on a show like that. By the way, once my movie hit Netflix in about 2012, my checks got slashed in half.

neil-gaiman
socialjusticeinamerica

image
theconcealedweapon

Ruby Bridges is 68. This is not ancient history. Not even close.

neil-gaiman

I know Ruby. She's a really nice person. The idea that they would try and write what she did as a girl out of history is shocking to me on so many levels, the simplest of which is just, but don't they know how lovely she is?

jld-az

image

Ruby was in Tucson, AZ last Thanksgiving. I wasn't able to attend due to illness, but I appreciated the opportunity.

sacredfire44
midnightssea

image

The original tweet is the corniest thing I’ve ever fucking seen

ovenroastedtwerkey

A. They're not gonna tip you, periodt. So already the $10mil is looking better.

B. They're not gonna talk to you, so any "business advice" you thought was gonna be worth more than $10mil, that's null and void, aint happening.

C. Here's the real secret of their "success"; they're all bad people. That's literally it. They're willing to lie, steal, cheat, bully, oppress, rape, etc to get what they want, and their appetites are never sated, so they never stop lying, cheating, etc. You don't get that kind of money through hard honest work. If you're willing to be a big enough piece of shit, you could easily be one of these guys.

So yeah, if someone's offering that choice, get it in writing and stay the hell away from these creeps.

red-mercer

But if you're serving them you can poison the food

hintsiren

image

Originally posted by baileyjoseph

athina39
escuerzoresucitado

image
beingcuteismything

Okay wait this brings up a point Dr. Richard D Wolff (americas leading Marxist economist) brought up in a lecture a while ago; economics needs an ethics review board.

Every other major discipline has an ethics review board. If you're a doctor and prescribe a patient a lethal dose of the wrong medicine, you get disciplined. If you're a biologist and commit animal cruelty, you get disciplined. If you're a psychologist and conduct an unethical study, you get disciplined. If you're an engineer and neglect safety standards when building a bridge, you get disciplined.

But if you're an economist and your policies actively harm people in a demonstrable way, nothing happens. It's all just a 'matter of opinion'

American and other western economists advised the Russian government on how to run the country following the end of the ussr and its estimated that the economic policies they recommended directly lead to the deaths of millions of people. And not a single economist so much as even lost their job.

Economics degrees also need courses on ethics and the real human impact of economic policies so that economists can learn how to avoid harm in the first place.

See this in the app Show more